|
In a semi-annual survey of occupancy costs conducted
by property consultant,
C B Richard Ellis, for comparable class 'A' office
space in 155 metros around the world, cities
were ranked according to their rentals.
According to the ranking, London (West
End) is still the most expensive location for office
space in the world at $146.33 occupancy cost.
Next comes Tokyo with $122.34 followed by London
(City) at $112.3.
In India, the office market continues
to slip further against the global market rents. While
Mumbai is ranked 11th most expensive city
in the world, as against it's 8th rank last year,
New Delhi's ranking slipped to 32nd from 28th
last year. The fall in occupancy costs in both cases
were attributed to relocation of corporate tenants to
suburban areas, where newer buildings offering high
quality construction and state-of-the-art infrastructure
are relatively much more cost effective. While Mumbai's
occupancy cost has dipped 29% to $56.90 per
sft, New Delhi's is now down to $40.84.
Cost
of Living Index
The ET Intelligence Group that compiled the latest
cost of living index survey, studied eight major
cities across India with a focus on the higher middle
income category households to find out how spending
patterns vary across these cities. The survey first
drew up the consumption basket with quantities for a
representative family and then covered prices of about
50 items, ranging from grocery items to fruits and vegetables
to even services like an ordinary haircut.
What they came up with is that Mumbai
is the costliest city to live in, while Hyderabad is
the cheapest. After Mumbai, Delhi emerges as the second
costliest city, followed by Bangalore, Pune and Chennai.
On the other hand, the relatively cheaper cities to
live in are: Hyderabad, Kolkata and Ahmedabad. So, if
you are in Hyderabad, live life kingsize!
The differences in the cost of living
across major Indian cities are quite substantial. But
if you look closely, there are just two items that are
responsible for a major portion of the divergence in
cost of living: rent and travel. Commuting to work is
quite expensive in cities like Mumbai and Delhi, mainly
because of the longer commuting distance. However, if
one were to exclude the rent and travel expenses, then
Mumbai would be only 9 per cent costlier than Delhi
as against 25 per cent now, considering the rent and
travel expenses factor.
(Base New Delhi = 100)
| City |
Food
|
Fruit & Veg
|
Rent & Travel
|
Overall
|
| Mumbai |
116
|
123
|
144
|
125
|
| New Delhi |
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
| Bangalore |
99
|
90
|
77
|
86
|
| Pune |
102
|
103
|
72
|
83
|
| Chennai |
101
|
106
|
69
|
81
|
| Ahmedabad |
99
|
97
|
40
|
73
|
| Kolkata |
96
|
88
|
53
|
72
|
| Hyderabad |
94
|
98
|
39
|
67
|
Note:
1. An index no. of 125 means the cost of living
for that particular category is 25% more than in Delhi.
2. The fruit & veg category is a sub-category within
the overall food category.
So the next time you are offered a prize job in Mumbai,
think twice. You would be spending 87% more than if you
were staying in Hyderabad. On the other hand, if you were
to move from Mumbai to Kolkata, you would be saving a
huge 42% on expenses.
Source: The Economic Times |